To reduce excessive eating a lot of people drink water first just before eating. Should eliminate the habit, if you want a drink before dinner, then do an hour before a meal.

Eating too much water just before eating it makes you lose your appetite because the stomach becomes full. But drinking water just before eating will make the process of absorption of food by the enzyme becomes more difficult.

Because drinking water takes 30 minutes to flow from the stomach into the intestines. So if a drink just before eating, the water had not been added into the intestine with the food that makes an enzyme work more difficult.

Experts suggested that the enzyme drinking water is 1 hour before meals.

Like the plants, he said there was a good period for drinking because of excessive watering the plants would make plants become rotten and withered. So that there is an appropriate time period for the body to drink water.

The ideal way to meet the need of water for the body are:

1-3 glasses of waking in the morning,
2-3 cups, 1 hour before lunch
2-3 cups, 1 hour before dinner.

That must be considered is the drinking water after waking up for the lost fluid must be rapidly replaced when waking up.

And do not drink water before bed but if you are thirsty can be done one hour before bedtime.

Drinking water just before bed can prevent back flow. Although only the water, when mixed with stomach acid into the throat and can be inhaled into the lungs, the feared risk of suffering from pneumonia.

Get used to sleep with empty stomachs because the throat was designed so that no one goes into it except air. If you still have food or drinks, the stomach contents will spill up into the esophagus when you lay down. When that happens, the body will narrow windpipe and stop your breathing to prevent the stomach contents into the throat.

Many incidents of people dying of a heart attack at dawn. The reason is because the acid that flows back as a result of eating or drinking late at night, and ends at the closing of the respiratory tract, and so does not irregular breathing, blood oxygen levels decreased and finally lack of oxygen supply to the heart muscle.

Admittedly, each person needs different drink but make it a habit to drink water 6-8 glasses per day (1.5-2 liters) for adults. If the weather is very hot as the person would need to drink more. Conversely people who have weak digestive systems may experience diarrhea if you drink too much.

The number of water a person needs varies depending on the size of the person’s body and what is considered appropriate for the body. It’s just still watch the times for the ideal drinking, drinking outside the other needs.

If the water needs are met well and you’ll rarely get sick. As water needs are met, the water will moisten the areas in which the body easily attacked by bacteria and viruses such as the bronchi (respiratory tube), stomach and intestinal mucosa. In this way the immune system becomes active so that these areas become difficult to attack a virus or bacteria.

Conversely, if water is consumed less in the bronchial mucous membrane will become dehydrated and dried, where the sputum and bronchial secretions produced in. If there is not enough water then the phlegm and mucus will stick to the bronchi which later became his place multiply viruses and bacteria.

Water is important for the body. If no water people are not only malnourished, but the dirt and toxins also accumulate in the cell and can not be issued. Bad effect, the accumulated toxins that will damage the cells of one gene that can cause changes to the genes into cancer cells.

The British Medical Journal (BMJ) on its website, quoting the reassuring (or mea culpa?) Professor Liam Donaldson, Director General of Health, who acknowledged during a news conference that the virus eventually H1N1 had created a “swine flu” considerably less lethal than feared. ” Official recognition of this hoax has angered some health professionals, who have not failed to express their discontent over the BMJ’s website.

The Department of Health NHS (National Health) feared being overwhelmed by the intensity of influenza A/H1N1 …which does not happen: the NHS is the shock, and for good reason.

He mentioned the two waves that rocked the United Kingdom (ie England, Scotland, Wales and Northern Ireland), the first in early summer, the second this fall, there were 290,000 cases in the first, 482,000 for the second case, the first being fallen faster (in terms of incidence), while the second tends to last. Thus, the second wave has led to more hospitalizations than the first. But for the NHS, it would move toward its end – that is, the peak alert is over.

At December 21, the number of inpatients was 523, including 113 intensive care. Since the month of April (beginning of the epidemic), 298 deaths were registered in the United Kingdom. In England, Scotland, Wales and Northern Ireland, the number of new cases continues to decline each week, between 1,000 and 2,000 fewer cases per week.

Official recognition of this hoax has angered some health professionals, who have not failed to express their discontent over the BMJ’s website.

- “What a relief to know that the swine flu is less lethal than feared,” wrote one of them, stressing that in its regular bulletins WHO “carefully avoids making alarmist predictions of morbidity mortality, especially as it confirmed from several sources that it has been declining since last month. Final thought, found apparently in France it: “We have the impression that our Department of Health has tried repeatedly to” play safe “by bombarding the public with figures alarmist and speculative.”

Question: “How much taxpayer money was used for these campaigns? “…

“Another correspondent, quoting the title of a Shakespeare play: Much ado about nothing – in French: Much ado about nothing, adding:” … while millions of people continue to die [the fault] real killers . The reproach was unnecessarily scared to developing countries, while “it is time for developing economies, like India, focusing on saving people dying of problems more severe and treatable like malaria, pneumonia, diarrhea” , this correspondent felt that these countries “have wasted millions of precious dollars in the fight against H1N1.

For another, finally, the warning was an H1N1 “Alarm-gate” scandal as alarming was the Watergate scandal. He writes: “Climatologists and epidemiologists … have unknowingly passed a public service: Climate-Flu-gate and gate were immunized against the public alarmism spread by the media” …

Meanwhile the UK continues vaccinations. At December 21, 3 million people from priority groups had been vaccinated, including 101,000 pregnant women.

Scientists from Gladstone Institute of Virology and Immunology in the U.S. have discovered a new agent that could inhibit the ability of HIV infection. The study results are published in the Journal of Biological Chemistry ‘.

The agent, called surfeno disables the action of a factor in semen that greatly increases the viral infection. The surfeno could be used as a supplement in the current HIV microbicides to substantially reduce transmission of HIV during sexual contact.

The surfeno is a small molecule that inhibits the actions of certain molecules of polysaccharides called heparan sulfate proteoglycans (HSPG, according to its acronym in English) found on the surface of cells. The surfeno also interferes with the action of the promoter of the semen-derived viral infection (SEVI).

Warner explains Greene, head of the study, “surprisingly, although HIV replicates immediately once it is in the body, the virus struggle to establish a main line of infection during sexual transmission. SEVI We have been studying as a factor present naturally in semen of HIV that can convert thousands of times more infectious. Learn more about the surfeno, SEVI inhibitor, could afford to reduce rates of HIV transmission.

SEVI is a byproduct of a common protein in semen and under certain circumstances can increase the infectivity of HIV per 100,000 to facilitate the binding of virus to cells it targets. As most HIV infections occur through sexual contact, SEVI could have a significant impact on HIV transmission rates. The surfeno interferes with the binding of SEVI to target cells and HIV-1 virions but not its decomposition.

Initially, the researchers found that negatively charged polymers such as heparin sulphate, interfere with the binding of SEVI to target cells. This led them to hypothesize that SEVI fibrils bind to target cells by interacting with cell surface HSPG, anionic carbohydrate polymers that occur naturally with a structure resembling the heparin sulfate .

The scientists examined HSPG antagonists could interfere with the binding of SEVI the virus and target cells. They focused on surfeno, identified in 1938 and was known its anti-inflammatory and antibacterial. The authors found that increased surfeno inhibits the infectivity of HIV-1 mediated SEVI or semen. After surfeno showed that interferes with the binding of SEVI both HIV target cells and its virions.